4.7 Article

Impacts of water depth increase on offshore floating wind turbine dynamics

Journal

OCEAN ENGINEERING
Volume 224, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.108697

Keywords

FOWT; Failure condition; Water depths effects; Slack mooring; Taut mooring

Funding

  1. UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) CAMREG project [EP/P007805/1]
  2. EPSRC [EP/P007805/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the effect of water depth increase on the global performance of a floating offshore wind turbine, finding that water depth has a significant impact on platform heave motion and tower base bending force, while its effects on mooring lines are more pronounced.
This paper aims at investigating the effect of water depth increase on the global performance of a floating offshore wind turbine, with a special focus on the environmental loading effects and turbine operating status. An integrated aero-hydro-servo-elastic (AHSE) analysis was simulated in the time domain. The model was first validated against published results in terms of mooring system restoring force and platform natural frequencies. The considered water depth is between 200 and 300 m, which is the deep-water range used in the current floating offshore wind turbine (FOWT) industry. In this study, both normal operating and failure conditions were considered. Key conclusions from case studies indicated that, based on the current water depth range, platform heave motion with slack mooring configurations and mooring line top tension are more sensitive to water depth. Water depth increase influences the tower base bending force when the turbine has a high-speed shaft brake due to grid loss, but the effects are restricted to the high-frequency response range (>2 Hz) and less obvious than the influences on mooring lines.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available