4.4 Article

Adherence to dietary guidelines is associated with better physical and mental quality of life: results from a cross-sectional survey among 728 Dutch MS patients

Journal

NUTRITIONAL NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 25, Issue 8, Pages 1633-1640

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/1028415X.2021.1885240

Keywords

Multiple sclerosis; diet; quality of life; nutrition; dietary guidelines; MS-specific diet; mental health; lifestyle

Funding

  1. National Multiple Sclerosis Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that adherence to the Dutch dietary guidelines is associated with better physical and mental quality of life, especially in female MS patients. Individuals following a specific diet also have higher diet quality and quality of life.
Background A healthy diet has been associated with less symptoms or progression of disease in multiple sclerosis (MS). However, whether specific diets are needed, or general healthy diet recommendations are sufficient is unknown. Objective To investigate the association between diet quality, use of diets, and quality of life (QoL) in men and women with MS. Methods Diet quality was measured with the Dutch Healthy Diet-index, which measures adherence to the Dutch Guidelines for a Healthy Diet. QoL was assessed with the MSQoL-54 questionnaire. A total of 728 people were included (623 women, 105 men). Multiple linear regression, stratified for gender, was used to analyse the data. Results In women with MS, an association was found between diet quality and both physical and mental QoL after adjusting for several confounders (Physical Health Composite Score (beta=0.410; P=0.001); Mental Health Composite Score (beta=0.462; P=0.002)). Similar results were less pronounced in men. Subjects following a specific diet had higher diet quality and QoL than subjects not following a diet. Conclusion Adherence to the Dutch dietary guidelines is associated with better physical and mental QoL, especially in women. Following an MS-specific diet may help to adhere to these guidelines.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available