4.4 Article

Optimization of the JUNO liquid scintillator composition using a Daya Bay antineutrino detector

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2020.164823

Keywords

Neutrino; Liquid scintillator; Light yield

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of China
  2. U.S. Department of Energy
  3. Chinese Academy of Sciences
  4. CAS Center for Excellence in Particle Physics
  5. National Natural Science Foundation of China
  6. Guangdong provincial government
  7. Shenzhen municipal government
  8. China General Nuclear Power Group
  9. Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of China
  10. MOE in Taiwan
  11. U.S. National Science Foundation
  12. Ministry of Education, Youth, and Sports of the Czech Republic
  13. Charles University Research Centre UNCE
  14. National Key R&D Program of China
  15. Joint Large-Scale Scientific Facility Funds of the NSFC
  16. CAS
  17. Tsung-Dao Lee Institute of Shanghai Jiao Tong University in China
  18. Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN) in Italy
  19. Fond de la Recherche Scientifique (F.R.S-FNRS)
  20. FWO under the Excellence of Science C EOS in Belgium
  21. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico in Brazil
  22. Charles University Research Centre
  23. Ministry of Education, Youth, and Sports in Czech Republic
  24. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)
  25. Helmholtz Association
  26. Lomonosov Moscow State University
  27. Russian Foundation for Basic Research (RFBR) in Russia
  28. Joint Institute of Nuclear Research in Dubna, Russia
  29. National Commission of Scientific and Technological Research of Chile
  30. Wuyi University
  31. Institut National de Physique Nucleaire et de Physique de Particules (IN2P3) in France
  32. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico in Brazil, the Agencia Nacional de Investigacion y Desarrollo in Chile
  33. Cluster of Excellence PRISMA+ in Germany
  34. Joint Institute of Nuclear Research (JINR)
  35. MOST in Taiwan
  36. Chulalongkorn University
  37. Suranaree University of Technology in Thailand
  38. University of California at Irvine in USA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A 20 ton LS sample was produced in a pilot plant to study the optical properties of LS in different compositions for JUNO. The concentrations of PPO and bis-MSB were increased in steps to determine the optimal composition. Daya Bay data were used to tune an optical model for the JUNO simulation, resulting in the recommendation of purified LAB with 2.5 g/L PPO and 1 to 4 mg/L bis-MSB for JUNO LS.
To maximize the light yield of the liquid scintillator (LS) for the Jiangmen Underground Neutrino Observatory (JUNO), a 20 t LS sample was produced in a pilot plant at Daya Bay. The optical properties of the new LS in various compositions were studied by replacing the gadolinium-loaded LS in one antineutrino detector. The concentrations of the fluor, PPO, and the wavelength shifter, bis-MSB, were increased in 12 steps from 0.5 g/L and <0.01 mg/L to 4 g/L and 13 mg/L, respectively. The numbers of total detected photoelectrons suggest that, with the optically purified solvent, the bis-MSB concentration does not need to be more than 4 mg/L. To bridge the one order of magnitude in the detector size difference between Daya Bay and JUNO, the Daya Bay data were used to tune the parameters of a newly developed optical model. Then, the model and tuned parameters were used in the JUNO simulation. This enabled to determine the optimal composition for the JUNO LS: purified solvent LAB with 2.5 g/L PPO, and 1 to 4 mg/L bis-MSB.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available