4.5 Article

Dynamics of radial solutions for the focusing fourth-order nonlinear Schrodinger equations

Journal

NONLINEARITY
Volume 34, Issue 2, Pages 776-821

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6544/abcea5

Keywords

fourth-order nonlinear Schrodinger equation; scattering; blow-up; ground state; radial Sobolev embedding

Funding

  1. Labex CEMPI [ANR-11-LABX-0007-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the existence and properties of energy scattering and finite time blow-up solutions for focusing L-2-supercritical fourth-order nonlinear Schrodinger equations below the ground state threshold, with specific parameter ranges and initial conditions. Sharp thresholds for scattering and blow-up are identified for equations with radial data.
We consider the following class of focusing L-2-supercritical fourth-order nonlinear Schrodinger equations i partial derivative(t)u-Delta(2)u+mu Delta u=-|u|(alpha)u,(t,x)is an element of RxR(N), N >= 2, mu >= 0, and 8/N < alpha < alpha* with alpha* : = 8/N-4N >= 5 and alpha* = infinity if N <= 4. By using the localized Morawetz estimates and radial Sobolev embedding, we establish the energy scattering below the ground state threshold for the equation with radially symmetric initial data. We also address the existence of finite time blow-up radial solutions to the equation. In particular, we show a sharp threshold for scattering and blow-up for the equation with radial data. Our scattering result not only extends the one proved by Guo (2016 Commun. PDE 41 185-207), where the scattering was proven for mu = 0, but also provides an alternative simple proof that completely avoids the use of the concentration/compactness and rigidity argument. In the case mu > 0, our blow-up result extends an earlier result proved by Boulenger-Lenzmann (2017 Ann. Sci. ec. Norm. Super. 50 503-544), where the finite time blow-up was shown for initial data with negative energy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available