4.8 Article

Interleukin-6 Receptor Antagonists in Critically Ill Patients with Covid-19

Journal

NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
Volume 384, Issue 16, Pages 1491-1502

Publisher

MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2100433

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. European Union -through FP7-HEALTH2013-INNOVATION: the Platform for European Preparedness Against (Re-)emerging Epidemics (PREPARE) consortium [602525]
  2. European Union -through Horizon 2020 research and innovation program: the Rapid European Covid-19 Emergency Research response (RECOVER) consortium [101003589]
  3. Australian National Health and Medical Research Council [APP1101719]
  4. Health Research Council of New Zealand [16/631]
  5. Canadian Institutes of Health Research Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research Innovative Clinical Trials Program Grant [158584]
  6. U.K. NIHR
  7. NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre
  8. Health Research Board of Ireland [CTN 2014-012]
  9. UPMC Learning While Doing Program
  10. Breast Cancer Research Foundation
  11. French Ministry of Health [PHRC-20-0147]
  12. Minderoo Foundation
  13. Amgen
  14. Eisai
  15. Global Coalition for Adaptive Research
  16. Wellcome Trust Innovations Project [215522]
  17. NIHR Research Professorship [RP-2015-06-18]
  18. NIHR Clinician Scientist Fellowship [CS2016-16-011]
  19. Health Research Board (HRB) [CTN-2014-012] Funding Source: Health Research Board (HRB)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Interleukin-6 receptor antagonists tocilizumab and sarilumab were found to improve outcomes, including survival, in critically ill patients with Covid-19 receiving organ support in ICUs according to an ongoing international trial. The efficacy of these treatments has been confirmed, with patients benefiting from the therapy.
BACKGROUND The efficacy of interleukin-6 receptor antagonists in critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) is unclear. METHODS We evaluated tocilizumab and sarilumab in an ongoing international, multifactorial, adaptive platform trial. Adult patients with Covid-19, within 24 hours after starting organ support in the intensive care unit (ICU), were randomly assigned to receive tocilizumab (8 mg per kilogram of body weight), sarilumab (400 mg), or standard care (control). The primary outcome was respiratory and cardiovascular organ support-free days, on an ordinal scale combining in-hospital death (assigned a value of -1) and days free of organ support to day 21. The trial uses a Bayesian statistical model with predefined criteria for superiority, efficacy, equivalence, or futility. An odds ratio greater than 1 represented improved survival, more organ support-free days, or both. RESULTS Both tocilizumab and sarilumab met the predefined criteria for efficacy. At that time, 353 patients had been assigned to tocilizumab, 48 to sarilumab, and 402 to control. The median number of organ support-free days was 10 (interquartile range, -1 to 16) in the tocilizumab group, 11 (interquartile range, 0 to 16) in the sarilumab group, and 0 (interquartile range, -1 to 15) in the control group. The median adjusted cumulative odds ratios were 1.64 (95% credible interval, 1.25 to 2.14) for tocilizumab and 1.76 (95% credible interval, 1.17 to 2.91) for sarilumab as compared with control, yielding posterior probabilities of superiority to control of more than 99.9% and of 99.5%, respectively. An analysis of 90-day survival showed improved survival in the pooled interleukin-6 receptor antagonist groups, yielding a hazard ratio for the comparison with the control group of 1.61 (95% credible interval, 1.25 to 2.08) and a posterior probability of superiority of more than 99.9%. All secondary analyses supported efficacy of these interleukin-6 receptor antagonists. CONCLUSIONS In critically ill patients with Covid-19 receiving organ support in ICUs, treatment with the interleukin-6 receptor antagonists tocilizumab and sarilumab improved outcomes, including survival.(REMAP-CAP ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02735707.)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available