4.6 Review

A Quantitative Systematic Review of Clinical Outcome Measure Use in Peripheral Nerve Injury of the Upper Limb

Journal

NEUROSURGERY
Volume 89, Issue 1, Pages 22-29

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyab060

Keywords

Systematic review; Outcome assessment; Peripheral nerve injury

Funding

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC)
  2. Medical Research Council (MRC) Centre for Doctoral Training (CDT) in Regenerative Medicine [EP/L014904/1]
  3. Royal College of Surgeons/Sir John Fisher Foundation Research Fellowship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The systematic review identified 56 individual outcome measures used in the management of PNI across 28 different countries, with a total of 7097 patients. Ten core domains were defined to standardize outcome reporting and facilitate development of novel treatments in the field of peripheral nerve injury.
BACKGROUND: Peripheral nerve injury (PNI) is common, leading to reduced function, pain, and psychological impact. Treatment has not progressed partly due to inability to compare outcomes between centers managing PNI. Numerous outcome measures exist but there is no consensus on which outcome measures to use nor when. OBJECTIVE: To perform a systematic review in order to describe and classify outcome measures used in PNI. METHODS: A search of Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, Allied and Complementary Medicine Database (AMED), and CENTRAL (Cochrane Clinical Trials) was conducted. Randomized control trials (RCTs), cohort studies, and case-controlled and case series (>= 5 participants) published from inception of the database until 2019 investigating adult patients with a traumatic upper limb PNI in which an outcome measurement was utilized were included. RESULTS: A total of 96 studies were included (15 RCTs, 8 case-control studies, 18 cohort studies, 5 observational studies, and the remainder were case series or retrospective reviews). A total of 56 individual outcome measures were identified, utilized across 28 different countries and 7097 patients. Ten core domains were defined: sensory subjective, sensory objective, motor subjective, motor objective, sensorimotor function, psychology and well-being, disability, quality of life, pain and discomfort, and neurotrophic measures. CONCLUSION: Lack of consensus on outcome measure use hinders comparison of outcomes between nerve injury centers and the development of novel treatments. Development of a core outcome set will help standardize outcome reporting, improve translation of novel treatments from lab to clinical practice, and ensure future research in PNI is more amenable to systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available