4.7 Review

Beyond the binary: Rethinking sex and the brain

Journal

NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS
Volume 122, Issue -, Pages 165-175

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.11.018

Keywords

Brain structure; Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); Hypothalamus; Mosaic; Male-female continuum; Typical female brain; Typical male brain; Stress; Human; Rat

Funding

  1. Israel Science Foundation [217/16]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent research challenges the binary conceptualization of sex and brain relations, suggesting that human brains are comprised of mosaics of female-typical and male-typical features. Sex only explains a small part of the variability in human brain structure, leading to a non-binary framework that may have implications for research on sex-related variables.
The paper reviews the relations between sex and brain in light of the binary conceptualization of these relations and the challenges posed to it by the 'mosaic' hypothesis. Recent formulations of the binary framework range from arguing that the typical male brain is different from the typical female brain to claiming that brains are typically male or female because brain structure can be used to predict the sex category (female/male) of the brain's owner. These formulations are challenged by evidence that sex effects on the brain may be opposite under different conditions, that human brains are comprised of mosaics of female-typical and male-typical features, and that sex category explains only a small part of the variability in human brain structure. These findings led to a new, non-binary, framework, according to which mosaic brains reside in a multi-dimensional space that cannot meaningfully be reduced to a male-female continuum or to a binary variable. This framework may also apply to sex-related variables and has implications for research.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available