4.7 Article

Clarifying the role of higher-level cortices in resolving perceptual ambiguity using ultra high field fMRI

Journal

NEUROIMAGE
Volume 227, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117654

Keywords

Top-down; fMRI; Ultra High Field; Cognitive Neuroscience; Vision; Perception; Cortical Network; Task modulations

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [RF1 MH117015, RF1 MH116978, P41 EB027061, P30 NS076408]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

By utilizing faces as a visual category, specific task manipulations, and ultra-high field fMRI, the study revealed the crucial role of the right inferior-temporal lobe in top-down modulations under challenging conditions, uniquely encoding trial-by-trial variability in face perception.
The brain is organized into distinct, flexible networks. Within these networks, cognitive variables such as attention can modulate sensory representations in accordance with moment-to-moment behavioral requirements. These modulations can be studied by varying task demands; however, the tasks employed are often incongruent with the postulated functions of a sensory system, limiting the characterization of the system in relation to natural behaviors. Here we combine domain-specific task manipulations and ultra-high field fMRI to study the nature of top-down modulations. We exploited faces, a visual category underpinned by a complex cortical network, and instructed participants to perform either a stimulus-relevant/domain-specific or a stimulus-irrelevant task in the scanner. We found that 1. perceptual ambiguity (i.e. difficulty of achieving a stable percept) is encoded in top-down modulations from higher-level cortices; 2. the right inferior-temporal lobe is active under challenging conditions and uniquely encodes trial-by-trial variability in face perception.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available