4.7 Article

Hydrogeological assessment of non-linear underground enclosures

Journal

ENGINEERING GEOLOGY
Volume 207, Issue -, Pages 91-102

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2016.04.012

Keywords

Retaining walls; Jet grouting; Underground enclosure; Excavation; Shaft; Pumping test

Funding

  1. University of Liege
  2. EU through the Marie Curie BeIPD-COFUND postdoctoral fellowship programme [600405]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Excavations below the water table are usually undertaken by combining the protection of retaining walls with dewatering by pumping wells. Severe difficulties may arise if the retaining walls have defects. Therefore, their state must be determined and, if needed, the defects repaired or the dewatering system redesigned. The state of underground retaining walls can be evaluated using hydrogeological methods, but these methods are well established only for linear excavations. The objective of this work is to propose a procedure to evaluate the state of non-linear underground enclosures by analysing the groundwater response to pumping inside the enclosure. The proposed method, which is based on diagnostic plots (derivative of drawdown with respect to the logarithm of time), allows (1) determining if an underground non-linear enclosure has isolated openings or numerous defects and (2) computing its effective conductance or effective hydraulic conductivity. The methodology is tested with data collected during the excavation of a shaft required for the construction of the high speed train (HST) tunnel in Barcelona, Spain. The procedure can be applied using the wells drilled for dewatering. Although a test before the excavation is recommended to evaluate the underground retaining walls (Watertightness Assessment Test), the method can be applied using data collected at the beginning of the dewatering stage. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available