4.7 Article

Scalable characterization of the PAM requirements of CRISPR-Cas enzymes using HT-PAMDA

Journal

NATURE PROTOCOLS
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages 1511-1547

Publisher

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41596-020-00465-2

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH [R00-CA218870, P01-HL142494, R35 GM118158, RM1 HG009490]
  2. Career Development Award from the American Society of Gene Cell Therapy
  3. Margaret Q. Landenberger Research Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The protocol of HT-PAMDA allows for scalable characterization of the PAM preferences of different Cas proteins, enabling comprehensive comparison and profiling of natural and engineered enzymes in a cost-effective and efficient manner, making it a valuable tool for CRISPR-Cas research.
The continued expansion of the genome-editing toolbox necessitates methods to characterize important properties of CRISPR-Cas enzymes. One such property is the requirement for Cas proteins to recognize a protospacer-adjacent motif (PAM) in DNA target sites. The high-throughput PAM determination assay (HT-PAMDA) is a method that enables scalable characterization of the PAM preferences of different Cas proteins. Here, we provide a step-by-step protocol for the method, discuss experimental design considerations, and highlight how the method can be used to profile naturally occurring CRISPR-Cas9 enzymes, engineered derivatives with improved properties, orthologs of different classes (e.g., Cas12a), and even different platforms (e.g., base editors). A distinguishing feature of HT-PAMDA is that the enzymes are expressed in a cell type or organism of interest (e.g., mammalian cells), permitting scalable characterization and comparison of hundreds of enzymes in a relevant setting. HT-PAMDA does not require specialized equipment or expertise and is cost effective for multiplexed characterization of many enzymes. The protocol enables comprehensive PAM characterization of dozens or hundreds of Cas enzymes in parallel in <2 weeks.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available