4.8 Article

Ultra-high-quality two-dimensional electron systems

Journal

NATURE MATERIALS
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages 632-+

Publisher

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41563-021-00942-3

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [DMR 1709076, ECCS 1906253, MRSEC DMR 1420541]
  2. Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation's EPiQS programme [GBMF9615]
  3. Department of Energy Basic Energy Sciences [DE-FG02-00-ER45841]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

By improving sample quality and innovating materials and vacuum chamber design, researchers have achieved a breakthrough in GaAs quantum well systems with two-dimensional electrons, demonstrating high mobility and low residual impurities.
Two-dimensional electrons confined to GaAs quantum wells are hallmark platforms for probing electron-electron interactions. Many key observations have been made in these systems as sample quality has improved over the years. Here, we present a breakthrough in sample quality via source-material purification and innovation in GaAs molecular beam epitaxy vacuum chamber design. Our samples display an ultra-high mobility of 44 x 10(6) cm(2) V-1 s(-1) at an electron density of 2.0 x 10(11) cm(-2). These results imply only 1 residual impurity for every 10(10) Ga/As atoms. The impact of such low impurity concentration is manifold. Robust stripe and bubble phases are observed, and several new fractional quantum Hall states emerge. Furthermore, the activation gap (Delta) of the fractional quantum Hall state at the Landau-level filling (nu) = 5/2, which is widely believed to be non-Abelian and of potential use for topological quantum computing, reaches Delta approximate to 820 mK. We expect that our results will stimulate further research on interaction-driven physics in a two-dimensional setting and substantially advance the field. Source-material purification and optimized vacuum chamber design lead to a breakthrough in GaAs sample quality.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available