4.8 Article

Quantifying the effect of experimental perturbations at single-cell resolution

Journal

NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 39, Issue 5, Pages 619-+

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41587-020-00803-5

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development of the National Institues of Health (NIH) [F31HD097958]
  2. Gruber Foundation
  3. IVADO [PRF-2019-3583139727]
  4. NIH [R01GM135929, R01GM130847]
  5. Chan-Zuckerberg Initiative [182702, CZF2019-002440]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compares treatment and control single-cell RNA sequencing samples more accurately at the single-cell level. By developing a continuous measure of perturbation effects and using graph signal processing to estimate the relative likelihood of observing each cell in different experimental conditions, the study identifies cell populations affected by perturbations and improves the accuracy of identifying clusters of cells enriched or depleted in each condition. The algorithm developed in this study outperforms alternative algorithms in accurately deriving gene signatures from affected cell clusters.
Matched treatment and control single-cell RNA sequencing samples are more accurately compared at the single-cell level. Current methods for comparing single-cell RNA sequencing datasets collected in multiple conditions focus on discrete regions of the transcriptional state space, such as clusters of cells. Here we quantify the effects of perturbations at the single-cell level using a continuous measure of the effect of a perturbation across the transcriptomic space. We describe this space as a manifold and develop a relative likelihood estimate of observing each cell in each of the experimental conditions using graph signal processing. This likelihood estimate can be used to identify cell populations specifically affected by a perturbation. We also develop vertex frequency clustering to extract populations of affected cells at the level of granularity that matches the perturbation response. The accuracy of our algorithm at identifying clusters of cells that are enriched or depleted in each condition is, on average, 57% higher than the next-best-performing algorithm tested. Gene signatures derived from these clusters are more accurate than those of six alternative algorithms in ground truth comparisons.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available