4.8 Article

Structural insights into the inhibition of glycine reuptake

Journal

NATURE
Volume 591, Issue 7851, Pages 677-+

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-021-03274-z

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Novo Nordisk Foundation
  2. Lundbeck Foundation via the DANDRITE Neuroscience Center
  3. F. Hoffmann-La Roche
  4. EMBL Interdisciplinary Postdoc (EIPOD) programme under Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions COFUND [664726]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study utilized synthetic single-domain antibodies and serial synchrotron crystallography to determine the structure of GlyT1 in complex with an inhibitor, revealing that the inhibitor locks GlyT1 in an inward-open conformation and binds at the intracellular gate of the release pathway. These findings define the mechanism of inhibition and provide insights for the rational design of new, clinically efficacious GlyT1 inhibitors.
The human glycine transporter 1 (GlyT1) regulates glycine-mediated neuronal excitation and inhibition through the sodium- and chloride-dependent reuptake of glycine(1-3). Inhibition of GlyT1 prolongs neurotransmitter signalling, and has long been a key strategy in the development of therapies for a broad range of disorders of the central nervous system, including schizophrenia and cognitive impairments(4). Here, using a synthetic single-domain antibody (sybody) and serial synchrotron crystallography, we have determined the structure of GlyT1 in complex with a benzoylpiperazine chemotype inhibitor at 3.4 angstrom resolution. We find that the inhibitor locks GlyT1 in an inward-open conformation and binds at the intracellular gate of the release pathway, overlapping with the glycine-release site. The inhibitor is likely to reach GlyT1 from the cytoplasmic leaflet of the plasma membrane. Our results define the mechanism of inhibition and enable the rational design of new, clinically efficacious GlyT1 inhibitors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available