4.7 Article

A discussion on the adjustment parameters of the Slope Mass Rating (SMR) system for rock slopes

Journal

ENGINEERING GEOLOGY
Volume 206, Issue -, Pages 42-49

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2016.03.007

Keywords

Slope Mass Rating (SMR); Rock slope stability; Structurally-controlled failures; Adjustment factors; Kinematic analysis

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2015CB057903]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation Projects [41502268, 41202216]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2016QN4018]
  4. Research Programs of the Transportation Department of Zhejiang Province [2014H21, 2013H46]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rock mass classification systems are common tools used in the design and construction of rock engineering. Numerous classification systems have been developed for rock slopes, of which the Slope Mass Rating (SMR) system is the most popular. Consequently, many rock slope classification systems have been derived from the SMR system. However, these systems are not good at determining the values of the two adjustment parameters F-1 and F-3, implying that the original SMR system may contain theory defects. In this paper, we propose some corrected methods for determining F-1 and F-3 and perform a series of analyses considering the three failure modes of rock slopes: plane, wedge, and toppling failures. The results of the discrepancy analysis from F-1 illustrate that, with respect to each of the aforementioned three failure modes the calculated original SMR index is larger than, or equal to, the real value, and the designed slope is possibly in danger. The results of the discrepancy caused by the F-3 illustrate that for each of the aforementioned three failure modes, the calculated original SMR index is smaller than, or equal to, the real value, and the designed slope might be conservative and not economical. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available