4.3 Article

Neurofilament light chain in a phase 2 clinical trial of ibudilast in progressive multiple sclerosis

Journal

MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL
Volume 27, Issue 13, Pages 2014-2022

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1352458520986956

Keywords

Multiple sclerosis; biomarker; neurofilament

Funding

  1. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) [U01NS082329, U01NS077179, U01NS077352]
  2. National Multiple Sclerosis Society [RG 4778-A6]
  3. MediciNova
  4. National Institutes of Health (NIH)
  5. Swiss National Science Foundation [320030_189140]
  6. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [320030_189140] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of ibudilast treatment on serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) levels of neurofilament light (NfL) in progressive multiple sclerosis (MS). The results showed no significant difference in NfL levels in either serum or CSF between the treatment and placebo groups.
Background: Sensitive and specific biomarkers for use in progressive multiple sclerosis (MS) have not been established. We investigate neurofilament light (NfL) as a treatment response biomarker in progressive MS. Objective: To evaluate whether ibudilast 100 mg/day alters serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) levels of NfL in progressive MS. Methods: In a protocol-defined exploratory analysis from a 2-year, phase 2 clinical trial of ibudilast in progressive MS (NCT01982942), serum samples were collected from 239 subjects and a subset contributed CSF and assayed using single-molecule assay (SIMOA) immunoassay. A mixed model for repeated measurements yielded log(NfL) as the response variable. Results: The geometric mean baseline serum NfL was 31.9 and 28.8 pg/mL in placebo and ibudilast groups, respectively. The geometric mean baseline CSF NfL was 1150.8 and 1290.3 pg/mL in placebo and ibudilast groups, respectively. Serum and CSF NfL correlations were r = 0.52 and r = 0.78 at weeks 48 and 96, respectively. Over 96 weeks, there was no between-group difference in NfL in either serum (p = 0.76) or CSF (p = 0.46). After controlling for factors that may affect NfL, no effect of ibudilast on NfL in either serum or CSF was observed. Conclusion: Ibudilast treatment was not associated with a change in either serum or CSF NfL.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available