4.6 Review

Conditionally Activated (Caged) Oligonucleotides

Journal

MOLECULES
Volume 26, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules26051481

Keywords

caged oligonucleotides; transcriptome in vivo analysis; enzyme activation

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01 GM083030, R35 GM131907]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review presents recent advances in caging strategies for oligonucleotides, with a focus on oligo cyclization as an attractive approach. It also discusses the application of circular caged oligos in gene regulation and in Transcriptome In Vivo Analysis (TIVA) for mRNA isolation. Additionally, it introduces a protease-activated oligo probe designed for caspase-3, expanding the toolkit for studying the transcriptome under specific physiologic conditions.
Conditionally activated (caged) oligonucleotides provide useful spatiotemporal control for studying dynamic biological processes, e.g., regulating in vivo gene expression or probing specific oligonucleotide targets. This review summarizes recent advances in caging strategies, which involve different stimuli in the activation step. Oligo cyclization is a particularly attractive caging strategy, which simplifies the probe design and affords oligo stabilization. Our laboratory developed an efficient synthesis for circular caged oligos, and a circular caged antisense DNA oligo was successfully applied in gene regulation. A second technology is Transcriptome In Vivo Analysis (TIVA), where caged oligos enable mRNA isolation from single cells in living tissue. We highlight our development of TIVA probes with improved caging stability. Finally, we illustrate the first protease-activated oligo probe, which was designed for caspase-3. This expands the toolkit for investigating the transcriptome under a specific physiologic condition (e.g., apoptosis), particularly in specimens where light activation is impractical.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available