4.6 Article

Characterization of Orange Peel Waste and Valorization to Obtain Reducing Sugars

Journal

MOLECULES
Volume 26, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules26051348

Keywords

chemical composition; orange peel; proximate analysis; reducing sugars; SEM-EDS

Funding

  1. National Council on Science and Technology (CONACYT)
  2. Engineering Institute of the Universidad Autonoma de Baja California

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Millions of tons of food are produced annually to feed the growing world population, with oranges being a significant source. This study aimed to produce bioethanol from orange peel by fermenting reducing sugars, and determine the optimal experimental conditions for maximizing sugar yield.
Annually, millions of tons of foods are generated with the purpose to feed the growing world population. One particular eatable is orange, the production of which in 2018 was 75.54 Mt. One way to valorize the orange residue is to produce bioethanol by fermenting the reducing sugars generated from orange peel. Hence, the objective of the present work was to determine the experimental conditions to obtain the maximum yield of reducing sugars from orange peel using a diluted acid hydrolysis process. A proximate and chemical analysis of the orange peel were conducted. For the hydrolysis, two factorial designs were prepared to measure the glucose and fructose concentration with the 3,5-DNS acid method and UV-Visible spectroscopy. The factors were acid concentration, temperature and hydrolysis time. After the hydrolysis, the orange peel samples were subjected to an elemental SEM-EDS analysis. The results for the orange peel were 73.530% of moisture, 99.261% of volatiles, 0.052% of ash, 0.687% of fixed carbon, 19.801% of lignin, 69.096% of cellulose and 9.015% of hemicellulose. The highest concentration of glucose and fructose were 24.585 and 9.709 g/L, respectively. The results highlight that sugar production is increased by decreasing the acid concentration.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available