4.7 Article

DNA methylation markers have universal prognostic value for anal cancer risk in HIV-negative and HIV-positive individuals

Journal

MOLECULAR ONCOLOGY
Volume 15, Issue 11, Pages 3024-3036

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/1878-0261.12926

Keywords

anal cancer; anal intraepithelial neoplasia; host cell DNA methylation markers; HIV; human papillomavirus

Categories

Funding

  1. KWF Kankerbestrijding (Dutch Cancer Society) [2016-10781]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

DNA methylation markers show high accuracy for detecting AIN3+ in both HIV-positive and HIV-negative risk groups, supporting the broad application of methylation analysis in anal cancer prevention programs.
Anal cancer has increasing incidence and is preceded by high-grade anal intraepithelial neoplasia (HGAIN; AIN2-3). Previously, we identified and validated several methylation markers for accurate detection of anal cancer and HGAIN with cancer risk in HIV-positive (HIV+) men who have sex with men (MSM). This study aimed to evaluate these markers in HIV-negative risk groups. A cross-sectional series of 176 tissue samples of anal cancer, AIN3, AIN2, AIN1 and control biopsies obtained in HIV-negative women and men was tested for six methylation markers (ASCL1, LHX8, SST, WDR17, ZIC1 and ZNF582). Accuracy for detection of AIN3 and cancer (AIN3+) was determined by univariable and multivariable mixed-effect ordinal logistic regression. Methylation levels of all markers increased with increasing severity of disease (P < 0.0001) and were comparable to results in HIV+ MSM. All markers showed high accuracy for AIN3+ detection [area under the curve (AUC): 0.83-0.86]. The optimal marker panel (ASCL1 and ZIC1; AUC = 0.85 for AIN3+) detected 98% of cancers at 79% specificity. In conclusion, DNA methylation markers show a high diagnostic performance for AIN3+ detection in HIV+ and HIV-negative risk groups, justifying broad application of methylation analysis for anal cancer prevention programmes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available