4.7 Article

Epigenetic and transcriptional analysis reveals a core transcriptional program conserved in clonal prostate cancer metastases

Journal

MOLECULAR ONCOLOGY
Volume 15, Issue 7, Pages 1942-1955

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/1878-0261.12923

Keywords

ChIP‐ seq; cistrome; epigenomics; metastasis; prostate cancer; transcriptomics

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study investigated the epigenomic landscape of prostate cancer drivers in four clonal metastatic tumors from a single patient, revealing a core transcriptional program in clonal metastatic prostate cancer despite differences in the AR cistrome. Shared AR binding sites among healthy prostate, primary prostate cancer, and metastatic tumors signify core AR-driven transcriptional regulation within the prostate cell lineage.
The epigenomic regulation of transcriptional programs in metastatic prostate cancer is poorly understood. We studied the epigenomic landscape of prostate cancer drivers using transcriptional profiling and ChIP-seq in four clonal metastatic tumors derived from a single prostate cancer patient. Our epigenomic analyses focused on androgen receptor (AR), which is a key oncogenic driver in prostate cancer, the AR pioneer factor FOXA1, chromatin insulator CCCTC-Binding Factor, as well as for modified histones H3K27ac and H3K27me3. The vast majority of AR binding sites were shared among healthy prostate, primary prostate cancer, and metastatic tumor samples, signifying core AR-driven transcriptional regulation within the prostate cell lineage. Genes associated with core AR-binding events were significantly enriched for essential genes in prostate cancer cell proliferation. Remarkably, the metastasis-specific active AR binding sites showed no differential transcriptional output, indicating a robust transcriptional program across metastatic samples. Combined, our data reveal a core transcriptional program in clonal metastatic prostate cancer, despite epigenomic differences in the AR cistrome.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available