4.4 Article

Training matters! Narrative from a Black scientist

Journal

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY OF THE CELL
Volume 32, Issue 3, Pages 223-225

Publisher

AMER SOC CELL BIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1091/mbc.E20-07-0443

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation CAREER award [1553695]
  2. Div Of Molecular and Cellular Bioscience
  3. Direct For Biological Sciences [1553695] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There is a disproportional underrepresentation of Black scientists in STEM, especially in recruiting Black faculty and researchers. Factors contributing to this include lack of access to opportunities, negative training experiences, lack of effective mentoring, and other more lucrative career options.
As STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math) professionals, we are tasked with increasing our understanding of the universe and generating discoveries that advance our society. An essential aspect is the training of the next generation of scientists, including concerted efforts to increase diversity within the scientific field. Despite these efforts, there remains disproportional underrepresentation of Black scientists in STEM. Further, efforts to recruit and hire Black faculty and researchers have been largely unsuccessful, in part due to a lack of minority candidates. Several factors contribute to this including access to opportunities, negative training experiences, lack of effective mentoring, and other more lucrative career options. This is a narrative of a Black male scientist to illustrate some of the issues in retaining Black students in STEM and to highlight the impact of toxic training environments that exists at many institutions. To increase Black participation in STEM careers, we must first acknowledge, then address, the problems that exist within our STEM training environments in hopes to inspire and retain Black students at every level of training.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available