4.4 Article

A parallel DEM approach with memory access optimization using HSFC

Journal

ENGINEERING COMPUTATIONS
Volume 33, Issue 8, Pages 2463-2488

Publisher

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/EC-07-2015-0203

Keywords

DEM; High performance computing; HSFC; Cache performance; Domain partitioning

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to present a methodology for parallel simulation that employs the discrete element method (DEM) and improves the cache performance using Hilbert space filling curves (HSFC). Design/methodology/approach - The methodology is well suited for large-scale engineering simulations and considers modelling restrictions due to memory limitations related to the problem size. An algorithm based on mapping indexes, which does not use excessive additional memory, is adopted to enable the contact search procedure for highly scattered domains. The parallel solution strategy uses the recursive coordinate bisection method in the dynamical load balancing procedure. The proposed memory access control aims to improve the data locality of a dynamic set of particles. The numerical simulations presented here contain up to 7.8 millions of particles, considering a visco-elastic model of contact and a rolling friction assumption. Findings - A real landslide is adopted as reference to evaluate the numerical approach. Three-dimensional simulations are compared in terms of the deposition pattern of the Shum Wan Road landslide. The results show that the methodology permits the simulation of models with a good control of load balancing and memory access. The improvement in cache performance significantly reduces the processing time for large-scale models. Originality/value - The proposed approach allows the application of DEM in several practical engineering problems of large scale. It also introduces the use of HSFC in the optimization of memory access for DEM simulations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available