4.4 Article

Reliability of the transcranial Doppler ultrasound-derived mean flow index for assessing dynamic cerebral autoregulation in healthy volunteers

Journal

MEDICAL ENGINEERING & PHYSICS
Volume 89, Issue -, Pages 1-6

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2021.01.003

Keywords

Head-up tilt test; ICC; Standard error of the measurement; Limits of agreement; Autoregulatory index; Healthy

Funding

  1. Danish Victims Fund [16-910-00043]
  2. Danish Physical Therapy Association [15242]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study aimed to assess the reliability of Mxa in healthy participants, with results indicating acceptable reliability and LOA when based on 3-second averages in both supine and head-up tilt positions. Calculating Mxa from 5-second averages yielded the most reliable values during head-up tilt, while the poorest reliability was observed with 10-second averages.
The transcranial Doppler ultrasound-derived mean flow index (Mxa) is widely used for assessing dynamic cerebral autoregulation (dCA) in different clinical populations. This study aimed at estimating the relative and absolute reliability of Mxa in healthy participants in the supine position and during head-up tilt (HUT). Fourteen healthy participants were examined on two separate occasions during which, mean middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity (MCAv), non-invasive blood pressure, and heart rate were continuously recorded in the supine position and during HUT. Mxa was calculated as the correlation coefficient between mean arterial blood pressure and MCAv using either 3-, 5-, or 10-second averages collected over a 300 second period. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICCL1) was calculated to assess relative reliability, while the standard error of measurement (SEM), and limits of agreement (LOA) were used to assess absolute reliability. Mxa-based 3-second averages yielded a similar relative and absolute reliability in both positions. When Mxa was calculated from 5-second averages, the most reliable values were obtained during HUT. The poorest reliability was achieved using 10-second averages, regardless of posture. The Mxa shows fair reliability with acceptable LOA in healthy volunteers when based on 3-second averages, both in the supine position and during HUT. (C) 2021 IPEM. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available