4.7 Article

Fault diagnosis of rotating machinery based on recurrent neural networks

Journal

MEASUREMENT
Volume 171, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2020.108774

Keywords

Classification; Deep learning; Fault diagnosis; Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU); Multilayer perceptron (MLP)

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [61703385, 51805179, 51721092, 61400020401]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A novel method based on recurrent neural networks is proposed for fault type identification in rotating machinery, utilizing one-dimensional time-series vibration signals converted into two-dimensional images, with the introduction of Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) and multilayer perceptron (MLP) to achieve the best performance and robustness against noise compared to existing work.
Fault diagnosis of rotating machinery is essential for maintaining system performance and ensuring the operation safety. Deep learning (DL) has been recently developed rapidly and achieved remarkable results in fault diagnosis. However, the temporal information from time-series signals is ignored by convolutional neural networks (CNNs) based methods. Besides, the robustness against the noise is essential to methods for fault diagnosis. Therefore, a novel method based on recurrent neural networks (RNNs) is proposed to identify fault types in rotating machinery in this paper. One-dimensional time-series vibration signals are first converted into two-dimensional images. Then, Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) is introduced to exploit temporal information of time-series data and learn representative features from constructed images. A multilayer perceptron (MLP) is finally employed to implement fault recognition. Experimental results show that the proposed method achieves the best performance on two public datasets compared with existing work and exhibits the robustness against the noise.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available