4.7 Article

Investigation of work hardening behavior in multilayered steels architected by twinning induced plasticity steel and martensitic steel during uniaxial tension

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2021.140996

Keywords

TWIP steel; Martensitic steel; Multilayered s t e e l; Work hardening; Uniaxial tension

Funding

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS)
  2. Australian Academy of Science
  3. [15F15705]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the relationship between deformation twins and work hardening behaviors of TWIP steels by designing a new multilayered steel structure to eliminate the Portevin-Le Chatelier effect. It was found that deformation twins contribute to the higher toughness near the interface in TWIP steel layers and are the main reason for the improvement of the strength-ductility synergy of TWIP steels and MLS.
To realize deformation mechanisms of twinning induced plasticity (TWIP) steels is always challenging. It is because that two controversial theory (deformation twins induced dynamic Hall and Petch effect vs Portevin-Le Cha?telier effect) have been long existed and both are thought of contributing to the resulting work-hardening behavior during straining of TWIP steels. In this study, a new class of multilayered steel (MLS) architected by Fe?22Mn-0.6C (wt%) TWIP steel and martensitic steel alternatively was designed to eliminate the Portevin-Le Cha?telier (PLC) effect, in order to systematically study the relationship of deformation twins and the work hardening behaviors of TWIP steels. After tensile deformation, it was found that the fraction of twins contribute to the higher toughness near the area of the interface in TWIP steel layers annealed at two different temperatures, suggesting that the deformation twins occur more significantly near the interface. It was also found that deformation twins are the main reason resulting in the improvement of the strength-ductility synergy of TWIP steels as well as MLS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available