4.7 Article

Role of hot rolling procedure and solution treatment process on microstructure, strength and cryogenic toughness of high manganese austenitic steel

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2021.140881

Keywords

High manganese steel; Low temperature toughness; Rolling process

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province [2019-KF-25-04]
  2. Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK 20180984]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52005228]
  4. Doctoral Scientific Research Foundation of Jiangsu University of Science and Technology [1062931702]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that solution treatment is effective in improving the Charpy impact toughness of high manganese steels, but decreases strength. At low temperature, the stability of austenite is high. The impact fracture mode is ductile and the main deformation mechanism is mechanical twinning.
In this study, the relationship between mechanical properties and microstructure of high manganese steels processed by different rolling practice and solution temperatures were systematically studied in terms of strength and toughness using optical microscopy (OM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), electron back-scattered diffraction (EBSD), transmission electron microscopy (TEM) techniques. The experimental results suggested that the solution treatment is an effective method to improve Charpy impact toughness at -196 degrees C from similar to 68 J to similar to 120 J, while the strength decreases. The grain size coarsened with the increase of solution temperature. However, the change in strength and toughness was small. The role of grain coarsening on strength and toughness was weak. The stability of austenite at low temperature was high as the microstructure only consisted of austenite. The fracture mode during low-temperature impact process was ductile and the main deformation mechanism was mechanical twinning

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available