4.3 Article

Oxygen-rich Environment Ameliorates Cell Therapy Outcomes of Cardiac Progenitor Cells for Myocardial Infarction

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2020.111836

Keywords

Oxygenation; Myocardial infarction; Cardiac progenitor cells; Cell therapy

Funding

  1. National Institute for Medical Research Development (NIMAD) [957764]
  2. Royan Institute

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, a novel approach of co-transplantation of cardiac progenitor cells and oxygen generating microparticles was proposed for cell therapy of acute myocardial infarction. The strategy significantly improved heart function and reduced fibrotic tissue formation, potentially by providing an oxygen-rich microenvironment that promotes cell retention and differentiation.
To some extent, cell therapy for myocardial infarction (MI) has supported the idea of cardiac repair; however, further optimizations are inevitable. Combined approaches that comprise suitable cell sources and supporting molecules considerably improved its effect. Here, we devised a strategy of simultaneous transplantation of human cardiac progenitor cells (CPCs) and an optimized oxygen generating microparticles (MPs) embedded in fibrin hydrogel, which was injected into a left anterior descending artery (LAD) ligating-based rat model of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Functional parameters of the heart, particularly left ventricular systolic function, markedly improved and reached pre-AMI levels. This functional restoration was well correlated with substantially lower fibrotic tissue formation and greater vascular density in the infarct area. Our novel approach promoted CPCs retention and differentiation into cardiovascular lineages. We propose this novel co-transplantation strategy for more efficient cell therapy of AMI which may function by providing an oxygen-rich microenvironment, and thus regulate cell survival and differentiation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available