4.3 Article

Engineered silica nanoparticles are biologically safe vehicles to deliver drugs or genes to liver cells

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2020.111585

Keywords

Liver; Liver cancer; Silica nanoparticles; Cytotoxicity; Genotoxicity; Hemolysis; Colony formation; Cell-cycle; Mitochondrial membrane potentials

Funding

  1. Izmir Institute of Technology [2012IYTEBAP06]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study synthesized and characterized silica nanoparticles of different sizes, finding that they are not toxic to human liver cells and endothelial cells, and do not affect cell proliferation or red blood cell hemolysis activity.
Engineered silica nanoparticles (SiNP) are emerging materials for medical applications. Evaluating biological responses of specific cells treated with engineered silica nanoparticles is however essential. We synthesized and characterized the physicochemical properties of silica nanoparticles with two different sizes of 10 and 100 nm (10SiNP and 100SiNP) dispersed in cell culture medium. HuH-7, an epithelial-like human hepatoblastoma cell line and SK-HEP-1, a liver sinusoidal endothelial cell line (LSEC) are employed to evaluate their biological responses for the SiNP treatment. Primary human lymphocytes are used to assess genotoxicity recommended by OECD guidelines while erythrocytes are used to assess hemolytic activity. The engineered silica nanoparticles are not able to produce radical species, to alter the mitochondrial membrane potential, and induce any adverse effects on cell proliferation. The colony formation ability of HuH-7 hepatoblastoma cells was not affected following the SiNP treatment. Furthermore, SiNPs do not induce hemolysis of red blood cells and are not genotoxic. These findings suggest that SiNPs regardless of the size, amount, and incubation time are biologically safe vehicles to deliver drugs or genes to the liver.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available