4.6 Article

Structure and porosity of conductive carbon blacks

Journal

MATERIALS CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS
Volume 260, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2020.124177

Keywords

Carbon black; Electron microscopy; Gas adsorption; NL-DFT; Thermoporosimetry; NMR relaxometry; Electric conductivity

Funding

  1. Deanship of Scientific Research at King Khalid University [R.G. P2/81/41]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

By comparing the structure and porosity of two carbon black grades, it was found that Ketjenblack EC600JD has a higher specific surface and volume, as well as more disordered graphitic layers, and the impact of these differences on the electrical conductivity of nanocomposites was investigated.
The structure and porosity of carbon black (CB) grades determine the ultimate applications of these most industrially used members of carbon materials. Hence, one uses complimentary methods to investigate these features for two conductive CB grades in order to understand their effects on the electric properties of polymeric nanocomposites. The mean particle size, the aggregate structure and voids morphology are studied by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) whereas high resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) reveals the ordering of the graphitic layers inside a CB particle as well as particles interconnections. The specific surface, voids size distribution and specific voids volume are studied using nitrogen adsorption, differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) thermoporosimety and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) relaxometry. This comparative study revealed a relatively smaller particle size, higher specific surface and specific volume with more disorder graphitic layers in Ketjenblack EC600JD than in Printex XE2. Finally, one presents the effect of such structural and porosity differences on the electric conductivity of nanocomposites made of these two grades.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available