4.7 Article

Concentration distribution and assessment of heavy metals in surface sediments in the Zhoushan Islands coastal sea, East China Sea

Journal

MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN
Volume 164, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.112096

Keywords

Enrichment factor; Geoaccumulation index; Environmental risks; Surface sediments; Zhoushan islands coastal sea

Funding

  1. National Key Basic Research and Development Program of China [2018YFC031000303, 2017YFC0307704]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2020MD062]
  3. Marine Geological Survey Program of China Geological Survey [DD20190819]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study collected 51 surface sediment samples in the Zhoushan Islands coastal sea of the East China Sea to assess heavy metal contamination and environmental risks. The analysis revealed that Zn, Cr, Cd, and Hg may come from a common source, while Cu and Pb, as well as As, show different distribution patterns. The results suggest that Cu and Cd may pose environmental risks.
In an effort to assess the potential contamination and determine the environmental risks associated with heavy metals, 51 surface sediment samples (0-4 cm) were collected in the Zhoushan Islands coastal sea of the East China Sea (ECS). The heavy metal concentrations, grain size and total organic carbon (TOC) contents of these surface sediments were comprehensively analyzed. The results showed that the order of the average concentrations of heavy metals is Zn > Cr > Cu > Pb > As > Cd > Hg. Zn, Cr, Cd and Hg exhibit similar distribution and which derived from a common source, however, Cu, Pb and As present different distribution. The metal enrichment factor (EF) and geoaccumulation index (I-geo) values both suggest that Cu and Cd likely pose environmental risks. The results of this study could provide scientific data to authorities in charge of sustainable marine management.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available