4.7 Article

Integrated microwave- and enzyme-assisted extraction of phenolic compounds from olive pomace

Journal

LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 138, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2020.110621

Keywords

Enzymatic extraction; Microwave processing; Antioxidants; Olive pomace

Funding

  1. USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture [1023517]
  2. Fapesp [2017-2017/13059-4]
  3. CAPES - Coordination of Superior Level Staff Improvement -Brazil [001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study demonstrates that microwave-assisted extraction and enzyme-assisted extraction can enhance the extractability and efficiency of phenolic compounds in olive pomace, leading to high concentration extraction of phenolic compounds in a relatively short period of time.
The olive pomace (OP) is an underutilized byproduct from the olive oil extraction that has the potential to be used as a source of antioxidant phenolics for nutraceutical applications. The simultaneous use of enzymes (cellulase, pectinase, and tannase) and microwave processing was evaluated with respect to OP phenolic extractability and composition. Microwave-assisted extraction achieved similar phenolic extractability (272 mg GAE/g OP) to conventional solvent extraction using water as a solvent, a higher solids-to-liquid ratio (1:15 vs. 1:50, g/mL), and a shorter reaction time (17 vs. 120 min). The use of enzymes during microwave processing led to increased extractability of phenolics (341 mg GAE/g OP) at higher extraction temperature (60 degrees C) and faster heating strategy (5 min ramp time). Microwave-enzyme-assisted extraction and enzyme-assisted extraction produced phenolic extracts with a higher concentration of phenolic alcohols (22-48 mg/kg) and acids (including hydroxytyrosol) (17-26 mg/kg). Mixtures of pectinase, cellulose and tannase biotransformed OP phenolics thus leading to the production of elenolic acid at 1029 mg/kg.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available