4.3 Article

Is there an impact of measurable residual disease as assessed by multiparameter flow cytometry on survival of AML patients treated in clinical practice? A population-based study

Journal

LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA
Volume 62, Issue 8, Pages 1973-1981

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/10428194.2021.1889539

Keywords

AML; MRD; allogenic stem cell transplantation; overall survival; multiparameter flow cytometry

Funding

  1. Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions
  2. Region Skane
  3. Regional Cancer Center South

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Swedish national guidelines for AML treatment recommend analyzing MRD using MFC in the clinical setting. Most AML patients in complete remission after intensive chemotherapy had MRD-negative results, but there was no clear association with overall survival. Clinician awareness of the importance of MRD status could improve treatment outcomes.
The Swedish national guidelines for treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) recommend analysis of measurable residual disease (MRD) by multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) in bone marrow in the routine clinical setting. The Swedish AML registry contains such MRD data in AML patients diagnosed 2011-2019. Of 327 patients with AML (non-APL) with MRD-results reported in complete remission after two courses of intensive chemotherapy 229 were MRD-negative (70%), as defined by <0.1% cells with leukemia-associated immunophenotype in the bone marrow. MRD-results were reported to clinicians in real time. Multivariate statistical analysis adjusted for known established risk factors did not indicate an association between MFC-MRD and overall survival (HR: 1.00 [95% CI 0.61, 1.63]) with a median follow-up of 2.7 years. Knowledge of the importance of MRD status by clinicians and individualized decisions could have ameliorated the effects of MRD as an independent prognostic factor of overall survival.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available