4.7 Article

Extending vegetation site data and ensemble models to predict patterns of foliage cover and species richness for plant functional groups

Journal

LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY
Volume 36, Issue 5, Pages 1391-1407

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10980-021-01221-x

Keywords

Growth form; Residual error; Ensemble; Neural network; Predictive modelling; Site-based floristic records; Spatially-explicit vegetation models; Vegetation richness; Vegetation cover

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ensembles of artificial neural network models were trained to predict vegetation characteristics, with spatially-explicit models of different plant functional groups generated. The study demonstrated the importance of continuous maps of vegetation attributes for supporting decision-making across various spatial scales.
Context Ensembles of artificial neural network models can be trained to predict the continuous characteristics of vegetation such as the foliage cover and species richness of different plant functional groups. Objectives Our first objective was to synthesise existing site-based observations of native plant species to quantify summed percentage foliage cover and species richness within four functional groups and in totality. Secondly, we generated spatially-explicit, continuous, landscape-scale models of these functional groups, accompanied by maps of the model residuals to show uncertainty. Methods Using a case study from New South Wales, Australia, we aggregated floristic observations from 6806 sites into four common plant growth forms (trees, shrubs, grasses and forbs) representing four different functional groups. We coupled these response data with spatially-complete surfaces describing environmental predictors and predictors that reflect landscape-scale disturbance. We predicted the distribution of foliage cover and species richness of these four plant functional groups over 1.5 million hectares. Importantly, we display spatially explicit model residuals so that end-users have a tangible and transparent means of assessing model uncertainty. Results Models of richness generally performed well (R-2 0.43-0.63), whereas models of cover were more variable (R-2 0.12-0.69). RMSD ranged from 1.42 (tree richness) to 29.86 (total native cover). MAE ranged from 1.0 (tree richness) to 20.73 (total native foliage cover). Conclusions Continuous maps of vegetation attributes can add considerable value to existing maps and models of discrete vegetation classes and provide ecologically informative data to support better decisions across multiple spatial scales.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available