4.4 Article

Estimating Damages of Bid-Rigging in Design-Build Contracts Based on Simulation Model

Journal

KSCE JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages 1568-1577

Publisher

KOREAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-KSCE
DOI: 10.1007/s12205-021-1571-y

Keywords

Bid-rigging damage; Design-build; Competitive situation; Counterfactual competitive price; Expected return rates; Simulation model

Funding

  1. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science and ICT [2019R1A2C2010794]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2019R1A2C2010794] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study proposes an alternative approach to estimating damages from bid-rigging in design-build construction projects, utilizing a simulation model based on historical bidding data. The feasibility of the proposed model was demonstrated through a case study on a real railway construction project. This model can also be used to determine optimal bid prices for DB construction projects.
Bid-riggings have persisted as an issue in the construction industry with its estimated damages being the most troublesome element. This study identifies the current limitations in estimating these damages and proposes an alternative approach to estimate the damages from bid-rigging in design-build (DB) construction projects. This study investigated a hypothetical competitive scenario that reflected the pricing model in DB contracts aimed at both winning the project and making profits. The alternative approach utilized a simulation model based on each bidder's historical bidding data that could reproduce competitive bidding in DB-delivery. The feasibility of the proposed model was demonstrated with a case study conducted on a real railway construction project. This proposed model can also be used in determining an optimal bid price for DB construction projects.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available