4.7 Article

Explicit and implicit Valuation-Based System methods for the risk assessment of systems subject to common-cause failures under uncertainty

Journal

KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS
Volume 214, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2020.106665

Keywords

Risk assessment; Common-cause failure; Valuation-Based System; Belief functions theory; Uncertainty analysis

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51805326, 71632008]
  2. National Science and Technology Major Project [2017-I-0007-0008]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper proposes Valuation-Based System methods to model systems subject to common-cause failures, considering parametric uncertainty and model uncertainty. Both methods are suitable for modeling systems subject to common-cause failures under different kinds of uncertainties.
Multiple components within a system may fail or malfunction simultaneously due to a shared cause or common cause (CC). This kind of failure is referred to as a common-cause failure (CCF), and it contributes greatly to the system failure. Due to the insufficiency of relative data and system complexities, different kinds of uncertainties inevitably exist in real-world system modeling. This paper proposes explicit and implicit Valuation-Based System (VBS) methods to model systems subject to CCFs, and to evaluate the failure probability of such systems considering the parametric uncertainty related to state probabilities of components and the model uncertainty related to the system structure. Both methods are suitable to model systems subject to CCFs under different kinds of uncertainties, and allow the relationship among multiple CCs being s-independent, s-dependent or mutually exclusive. Finally, the proposed methods are applied to model hazardous material transportation accidents and to evaluate the occurrence probability of accidents using statistical data. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available