4.5 Article

Sex Differences Remain Under-Reported in Cardiovascular Publications

Journal

JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH
Volume 30, Issue 9, Pages 1253-1258

Publisher

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2020.8561

Keywords

sex-specific; cardiovascular publications; NIH funding

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite increasing interest and calls to action for studying sex differences in cardiovascular disease, only a small fraction of publications in the past decade have addressed this issue. There was no significant growth in the proportion of sex-specific publications over a recent 10-year period, except for general research articles.
Background: For the past two decades, there has been increased interest from medical journals and calls to action from various organizations such as the National Institutes of Health to study sex differences in cardiovascular (CV) disease. It is unknown whether this emphasis has translated to a growth in publications addressing sex differences in CV disease. Materials and Methods: We performed a bibliometric analysis of all CV publications from 2006 to 2015. The National Library of Medicine's PubMed database was searched for articles containing the phrases cardiac, cardiovascular or cardiology, in the first author affiliation field. This was followed by a subsequent search for publications containing any of the following phrases in the title and/or abstract: woman, women, female, females, gender, or sex. The presence of such terms defined the publication as sex-specific. Trends over time were analyzed for specified subgroups, including publication category and funding source. Results: A total of 189,543 CV publications were identified, out of which there were 24,615 (12.99%) sex-specific publications. For the 10-year period, there were no significant changes in the relative proportion of sex-specific publications. When specific publication categories were analyzed, there were significant proportional increase of sex-specific publications in general articles category, but not for reviews, clinical trials, meta-analysis, or letters. Conclusion: Despite calls for greater attention, only a small fraction of publications for the past decade have reported on sex differences. There was no significant proportional growth of sex-specific publications for a recent 10-year period, except for the general research articles.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available