4.5 Review

Breast Density Notification: A Systematic Review of the Impact on Primary Care Practitioners

Journal

JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH
Volume 30, Issue 10, Pages 1457-1468

Publisher

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2020.8898

Keywords

breast density; mammography; notification; legislation; primary care; systematic review

Funding

  1. NHMRC Principal Research Fellowship [1121110]
  2. NHMRC Research Leader Fellowship [1194410]
  3. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [1121110, 1194410] Funding Source: NHMRC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The review suggests that primary care practitioners have insufficient knowledge about breast density, lack comfort in discussing dense breasts with patients, and face challenges in determining the appropriate approach for managing women with dense breasts, especially in terms of supplemental screening. There is a need for further high-quality research and evidence-based guidelines to better support PCPs in this area.
Background: In the last decade, there has been an unprecedented amount of advocacy and attention surrounding the issue of breast density (BD) in relation to mammography screening. It is largely unknown what impact notifying women of their BD has had on clinical practice for PCPs. This systematic review aimed to synthesize evidence from existing studies to understand the impact of BD notification on primary care practitioners' (PCPs) knowledge, attitudes, and practice implications. Methods: Empirical studies were identified through relevant database searches (database inception to May 2020). Two authors evaluated the eligibility of studies, extracted and crosschecked data, and assessed the risk of bias. Results were synthesized in a narrative form. Results: Six studies of the 232 titles identified and screened were included. All studies were undertaken in the United States, with five conducted postlegislation in their respective states, and one study conducted in states that were both prelegislation and postlegislation. Five studies were quantitative, including four cross-sectional surveys, and one study was qualitative. Findings consistently demonstrated PCPs' overall lack of knowledge about BD, low level of comfort in discussing and managing patients in relation to dense breasts, and limited consensus on the most appropriate approach for managing women with dense breasts, particularly in relation to supplemental screening. Conclusions: This review highlights important gaps in PCPs' understanding of BD and confidence in having discussions with women about the implications of dense breasts. It identifies the need for high-quality research and the development of evidence-based guidelines to better support PCPs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available