4.2 Article

Nanopore sequencing as a rapid tool for identification and pathotyping of avian influenza A viruses

Journal

JOURNAL OF VETERINARY DIAGNOSTIC INVESTIGATION
Volume 33, Issue 2, Pages 253-260

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1040638720984114

Keywords

avian influenza A virus; MinION; nanopore; whole-genome sequencing

Funding

  1. California Food and Agricultural Code Section 224 (f)(1) funding - California Department of Food and Agriculture
  2. Agriculture and Food Research Initiative Competitive Grant from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture [2018-67015-28306]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study conducted whole-genome sequencing of influenza A virus (IAV) using MinION technology, showing high diagnostic sensitivity and accuracy in clinical samples from wild waterfowl, commercial poultry, and swine. Results demonstrated concordance between sequences obtained by MinION and Sanger sequencing methods, as well as reproducibility across different laboratories with >=99.8% consistency in the entirety of the IAV genomes sequenced.
We report whole-genome sequencing of influenza A virus (IAV) with 100% diagnostic sensitivity and results available in <24-48 h using amplicon-based nanopore sequencing technology (MinION) on clinical material from wild waterfowl (n = 19), commercial poultry (n = 4), and swine (n = 3). All 8 gene segments of IAV including those from 14 of the 18 recognized hemagglutinin subtypes and 9 of the 11 neuraminidase subtypes were amplified in their entirety at >500x coverage from each of 16 reference virus isolates evaluated. Subgenomic viral sequences obtained in 3 cases using Sanger sequencing as the reference standard were identical to those obtained when sequenced using the MinION approach. An inter-laboratory comparison demonstrated reproducibility when comparing 2 independent laboratories at >= 99.8% across the entirety of the IAV genomes sequenced.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available