4.5 Article

Midterm results after covered stenting of the superior mesenteric artery

Journal

JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY
Volume 74, Issue 3, Pages 902-+

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.02.038

Keywords

Acute mesenteric ischemia; Chronic mesenteric ischemia; Occlusive disease; Stent; Superior mesenteric artery

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite ongoing controversies regarding covered stents versus bare metal stents, experts recommend the use of covered stents in mesenteric occlusive disease. This study reported midterm results of covered stents in the superior mesenteric artery, showing satisfactory outcomes at 2-year follow-up with a significant rate of reinterventions.
Objective: Despite the continuing controversy of covered stents (CS) vs bare metal stents, the use of CS in mesenteric occlusive disease (MOD) has been recommended by expert centers. The aim of this study was to report midterm results with CS of the superior mesenteric artery. Methods: Between January 2014 and October 2019, patients with MOD with a severe atheromatous stenosis or occlusion of the superior mesenteric artery treated by mesenteric CS were included. Clinical presentation included both acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI), chronic mesenteric ischemia, and asymptomatic patients planned for major surgery. Demographics, procedure details, and follow-up data were prospectively collected and retrospectively reviewed. Study end points included primary patency, primary assisted patency, and secondary patency. Results: During the study period, 86 patients (mean age, 70 +/- 9 years; 57% males) were included. Clinical presentation was AMI (n = 42 [49%]), chronic mesenteric ischemia (n = 31 [36%]), and asymptomatic (n = 13 [15%]). The technical success rate was 97%. A total of 96 stents were implanted, including 86 proximal CS (Advanta V12, n = 73; Lifestream, n = 13). The mean length and mean diameter of the CS were 31.5 +/- 6.3 mm and 6.9 +/- 0.5 mm, respectively. Additional distal bare metal stents were used in 10 patients (12%) to overcome a kinking (n = 9) or a dissection (n = 1) downstream of the CS. All postoperative deaths occurred in patients with AMI (n = 11, 13%). During a median follow-up of 15.6 months (95% confidence interval [Cl],15.6 + 3.6 months),12 patients (14%) underwent reinterventions for either stent misplacement (n 3), stent recoil (n = 3), stent thrombosis (n = 2), de novo stenosis at the distal edge of the CS (n = 2), or gastric ischemia (n = 1). At 1 year, overall the primary patency, primary assisted patency, and secondary patency rates were 83% (95% CI, 83% +/- 9%), 99% (95% CI, 99% +/- 3%), and 99% (95% CI, 99% +/- 3%), respectively. At 2 years, the overall primary patency, primary assisted patency, and secondary patency rates were 76% (95% CI, 76% +/- 13%), 95% (95% CI, 95% +/- 8%) and 95% (95% CI, 95% +/- 8%), respectively. Conclusions: Mesenteric CS provide very satisfactory midterm results in patients with MOD, with an excellent primary assisted patency rate at 2 years, at the price of a significant reintervention rate.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available