4.5 Article

Comparison of surgical versus percutaneously created arteriovenous hemodialysis fistulas

Journal

JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY
Volume 74, Issue 1, Pages 209-216

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.12.086

Keywords

Arteriovenous fistula; EndoAVF; Ellipsys; Hemodialysis fistula; pAVF; Percutaneous fitsula

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compared the maturation and patency rates between percutaneous arteriovenous fistulas (pAVFs) created with the Ellipsys device and surgical arteriovenous fistulas (s-AVFs). pAVFs showed superior maturation rates, while s-AVFs had higher primary patency rates at 12 months. However, primary patency was comparable between the two groups at 24 months. s-AVFs required more frequent surgical revision and had more infection issues.
Objective: The aim of the present study was to compare the results between percutaneous arteriovenous fistulas (pAVFs) created with the Ellipsys device (Ellipsys Vascular Access System; Avenu Medical, San Juan Capistrano, Calif) and surgical arteriovenous fistulas (s-AVFs). Methods: A single-center retrospective comparative study of the first 107 patients who had undergone p-AVF creation with the Ellipsys system from May 2017 to May 2018 with an equal number of consecutive patients who had undergone sAVF creation in our center during the same period. The primary endpoints included the maturation and patency rates. The secondary endpoints were reintervention, risk of infection, and the incidence of steal syndrome and aneurysm formation. Results: The demographic, hypertension, and diabetes data were similar for both groups. The only difference between the two groups was that more p-AVF patients had already been receiving hemodialysis (61% vs 47%; P<.05). The p-AVFs showed superior maturation rates at 6 weeks (65% vs 50%; P = .01). The primary patency rates were greater for the s-AVFs at 12 months (86% vs 61%; P< .01). However, primary patency was comparable between the two groups at 24 months (52% vs 55%; P = .48). No significant difference was found in the secondary patency rates at 12 (90% vs 91%) and 24 (88% vs 91%) months. At the 2-year follow-up point, the rate of percutaneous reintervention was similar; however, the s-AVFs had required more frequent surgical revision (36% vs 17%; P = .01). Issues with wound healing and infection were also more frequent with s-AVFs (9% vs 0.9%; P<.01). Conclusions: Fistulas created percutaneously with the Ellipsys system showed superior maturation rates and similar patency with s-AVFs created in an experienced high-volume vascular surgery practice. p-AVFs had a lower risk of wound healing issues, infection, and surgical revision. Larger, prospective, randomized multicenter studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available