Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Biological or mechanical prostheses for isolated aortic valve replacement in patients aged 50-65 years: the ANDALVALVE study
Emiliano A. Rodriguez-Caulo et al.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY (2019)
Long-term outcomes of mechanical versus biological aortic valve prosthesis: Systematic review and meta-analysis
Rocio Diaz et al.
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY (2019)
Competing risks in survival data analysis
Almut Dutz et al.
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY (2019)
Mechanical versus biological valve prosthesis for surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with infective endocarditis
Ville Kyto et al.
INTERACTIVE CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC SURGERY (2019)
2017 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease The Task Force for the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)
Helmut Baumgartner et al.
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL (2017)
Mechanical or Biologic Prostheses for Aortic-Valve and Mitral-Valve Replacement
Andrew B. Goldstone et al.
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE (2017)
2017 AHA/ACC Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines
Rick A. Nishimura et al.
CIRCULATION (2017)
Efficacy and safety of novel oral anticoagulants in patients with bioprosthetic valves
Ajay Yadlapati et al.
CLINICAL RESEARCH IN CARDIOLOGY (2016)
Aortic valve replacement with mechanical vs. biological prostheses in patients aged 50-69 years
Natalie Glaser et al.
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL (2016)
Very long-term outcomes of the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount aortic valve in patients aged 50-65 years
Thierry Bourguignon et al.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY (2016)
Durability after aortic valve replacement with the Mitroflow versus the Perimount pericardial bioprosthesis: a single-centre experience in 2393 patientsaEuro
Per Hostrup Nielsen et al.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY (2016)
Calcific aortic stenosis
Brian R. Lindman et al.
NATURE REVIEWS DISEASE PRIMERS (2016)
Transcatheter valve-in-valve therapy using 6 different devices in 4 anatomic positions: Clinical outcomes and technical considerations
Lenard Conradi et al.
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY (2015)
National trends in utilization and in-hospital outcomes of mechanical versus bioprosthetic aortic valve replacements
Abby J. Isaacs et al.
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY (2015)
Early Structural Valve Deterioration of Mitroflow Aortic Bioprosthesis Mode, Incidence, and Impact on Outcome in a Large Cohort of Patients
Thomas Senage et al.
CIRCULATION (2014)
Survival and Long-term Outcomes Following Bioprosthetic vs Mechanical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients Aged 50 to 69 Years
Yuting P. Chiang et al.
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2014)
The Global Burden of Aortic Stenosis
Jeremy J. Thaden et al.
PROGRESS IN CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES (2014)
A Questionnaire to Assess the Relevance and Credibility of Observational Studies to Inform Health Care Decision Making: An ISPOR-AMCP-NPC Good Practice Task Force Report
Marc L. Berger et al.
VALUE IN HEALTH (2014)
Prognostic score-based balance measures can be a useful diagnostic for propensity score methods in comparative effectiveness research
Elizabeth A. Stuart et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2013)
Aortic Stenosis in the Elderly Disease Prevalence and Number of Candidates for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Meta-Analysis and Modeling Study
Ruben L. J. Osnabrugge et al.
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY (2013)
Updated Standardized Endpoint Definitions for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation The Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 Consensus Document
A. Pieter Kappetein et al.
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY (2012)
Hancock II Bioprosthesis for Aortic Valve Replacement: The Gold Standard of Bioprosthetic Valves Durability?
Tirone E. David et al.
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY (2010)
Developing practical recommendations for the use of propensity scores:: Discussion of 'A critical appraisal of propensity score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003' by Peter!Austin, Statistics in Medicine
Elizabeth A. Stuart
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE (2008)
Burden of valvular heart diseases: a population-based study
Vuyisile T. Nkomo et al.
LANCET (2006)
Operative risk of reoperative aortic valve replacement
DD Potter et al.
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY (2005)
Sample size formula for proportional hazards modelling of competing risks
A Latouche et al.
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE (2004)
A checklist for retrospective database studies - Report of the ISPOR task force on retrospective databases
B Motheral et al.
VALUE IN HEALTH (2003)