4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Spontaneous versus mechanical ventilation during video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for spontaneous pneumothorax: A randomized trial

Journal

JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY
Volume 163, Issue 5, Pages 1702-+

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.01.093

Keywords

spontaneous ventilation; mechanical ventilation; video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery; randomized controlled clinical trial; opioid anesthesia

Funding

  1. Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Disease

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study showed that spontaneous ventilation video-assisted thoracic surgery (SV-VATS) is not inferior to mechanical ventilation VATS (MV-VATS) in terms of complication rate for primary spontaneous pneumothorax patients undergoing blebectomy. Additionally, SV-VATS was associated with shorter procedural duration, recovery time, and food intake time.
Objective: Spontaneous ventilation video-assisted thoracic surgery (SV-VATS) is reported to have superior or equal efficacy on postoperative recovery to mechanical ventilation VATS (MV-VATS). However, perioperative safety of the SV-VATS blebectomy is not entirely demonstrated. Methods: We performed a noninferiority, randomized controlled trial (No. NCT03016858) for primary spontaneous pneumothorax patients aged 16 to 50 years undergoing a SV-VATS and the MV-VATS procedure. The trial was conducted at 10 centers in China from April 2017 to January 2019. The primary outcome was the comparison of intra- and postoperative complications between SV-VATS and MV-VATS procedures. Secondary outcomes included total analgesia dose, change of vital sign during surgery, procedural duration, recovery time, postoperative visual analog pain scores, and hospitalization length. Results: In this study, 335 patients were included. There was no significant difference between the SV-VATS group and the MV-VATS group in the intra- and postoperative complication rates (17.90% vs 22.09%; relative risk, 0.81; 95% confidence interval, 0.52-1.26; P =.346). The SV-VATS group was associated with significantly decreased total dose of intraoperative opioid agents; that is, sufentanil (11.37 mg vs 20.92 mg; P<.001) and remifentanil (269.78 mg vs 404.96 mg; P<.001). The SV-VATS procedure was also associated with shorter extubation time (12.28 minutes vs 17.30 minutes; P<.001), postanesthesia care unit recovery time (25.43 minutes vs 30.67 minutes; P =.02) and food intake time (346.07 minute vs 404.02 minutes; P =.002). Moreover, the SV-VATS procedure deceased the anesthesia cost compared with the MV-VATS ($297.81 vs $399.81; P<.001). Conclusions: SV-VATS was shown to be noninferior to MV-VATS in term of complication rate and in selected patients undergoing blebectomy for primary spontaneous pneumothorax.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available