☆ 4.6 Editorial Material

Commentary: Do or do not. There is no try: Which role for minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass?

JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY (2023)

Related references

Note: Only part of the references are listed.

Article Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems

Twenty-year outcomes of minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery: The Leipzig experience

Piroze M. Davierwala et al.

Summary: This study assessed the early and long-term outcomes of a large cohort of patients who underwent MIDCAB procedures and found that the surgery can be safely performed with very good outcomes. Despite worsening demographic profile of patients, the in-hospital mortality remained constant over the 22-year period.

JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY (2023)

Add to Collection

Article Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems

The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database: 2020 Update on Outcomes and Research

Michael E. Bowdish et al.

ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY (2020)

Add to Collection

Article Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems

2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization

Franz-Josef Neumann et al.

EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL (2019)

Add to Collection

Article Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems

Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery with bilateral internal thoracic arteries: the Leipzig experience

Piroze M. Davierwala et al.

ANNALS OF CARDIOTHORACIC SURGERY (2018)

Add to Collection

Article Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems

Minimally invasive direct coronary bypass compared with percutaneous coronary intervention for left anterior descending artery disease: a meta-analysis

Xiao-Wen Wang et al.

JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC SURGERY (2016)

Add to Collection

Article Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems

Dynamic trends in cardiac surgery: why the logistic EuroSCORE is no longer suitable for contemporary cardiac surgery and implications for future risk models

Graeme L. Hickey et al.

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY (2013)

Add to Collection

Commentary: Do or do not. There is no try: Which role for minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass?

Related references

Twenty-year outcomes of minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery: The Leipzig experience

The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database: 2020 Update on Outcomes and Research

2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization

Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery with bilateral internal thoracic arteries: the Leipzig experience

Minimally invasive direct coronary bypass compared with percutaneous coronary intervention for left anterior descending artery disease: a meta-analysis

Dynamic trends in cardiac surgery: why the logistic EuroSCORE is no longer suitable for contemporary cardiac surgery and implications for future risk models

Export Citation

Share Paper