4.7 Article

Application of the new method to determine the activation energies and optimum temperatures of inulin hydrolysis by exo-inulinases Aspergillus niger

Journal

JOURNAL OF THERMAL ANALYSIS AND CALORIMETRY
Volume 147, Issue 2, Pages 1371-1377

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10973-020-10495-3

Keywords

Optimum temperature; Exo-inulinase Aspergillus niger; Activation energy; Deactivation energy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study conducted a comparative analysis on exo-inulinases from various origins to determine the optimal temperatures and activation energies, revealing the significant impact of temperature on the hydrolysis of inulin.
Inulinases catalyze the hydrolysis of inulin to obtain fructose with a yield of about 90-95%. Inulin is a reserve carbohydrate in plant tubers like Jerusalem artichoke, chicory, garlic and onion, leek, rye, barley, dandelion, burdock, banana. The paper presents a comparative analysis to determine the optimum temperatures and the activation energies for various origin exo-inulinases from Aspergillus niger. The parameters were estimated based on the literature of the activity curves versus temperature for hydrolysis of inulin. It was assumed that both the hydrolysis reaction process and the deactivation process of exo-inulinase were first-order reactions by the enzyme concentration. The governing equations are formulated including the activation energy of the deactivation process and temperature effects. A mathematical model describing the effect of temperature on exo-inulinases from Aspergillus niger activity was used. Based on the comparison analysis, values of the activation energies E-a were in the range from 25.20 +/- 2.92 to 60.95 +/- 8.30 kJ mol(-1), the deactivation energies E-d were in the range from 80.86 +/- 3.59 to 268.66 +/- 24.06 kJ mol(-1) and the optimum temperature T opt was obtained in the range from 325.25 +/- 0.41 to 337.35 +/- 0.70K.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available