4.6 Article

Development and validation of prediction models for mechanical ventilation, renal replacement therapy, and readmission in COVID-19 patients

Journal

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocab029

Keywords

COVID-19; supervised machine learning; renal replacement therapy; respiration; artificial; patient readmission

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Library of Medicine (NLM) [F31LM012894]
  2. NIH, NLM [5T15LM007079]
  3. NIH, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [R01HL148248]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study developed predictive models for COVID-19 patients to predict outcomes such as MV, RRT, and readmission, which demonstrated high performance, calibration, and interpretability. These models show potential in accurately estimating outcome prognosis for COVID-19 patients in resource-constrained care settings. Additional external validation studies are needed to confirm the generalizability of the results.
Objective: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients are at risk for resource-intensive outcomes including mechanical ventilation (MV), renal replacement therapy (RRT), and readmission. Accurate outcome prognostication could facilitate hospital resource allocation. We develop and validate predictive models for each outcome using retrospective electronic health record data for COVID-19 patients treated between March 2 and May 6,2020. Materials and Methods: For each outcome, we trained 3 classes of prediction models using clinical data for a cohort of SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2)-positive patients (n = 2256). Cross-validation was used to select the best-performing models per the areas under the receiver-operating characteristic and precision-recall curves. Models were validated using a held-out cohort (n =855). We measured each model's calibration and evaluated feature importances to interpret model output. Results: The predictive performance for our selected models on the held-out cohort was as follows: area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve-MV 0.743 (95% CI, 0.682-0.812), RRT 0.847 (95% CI, 0.772-0.936), readmission 0.871 (95% CI, 0.830-0.917); area under the precision-recall curve-MV 0.137 (95% CI, 0.047-0.175), RRT 0.325 (95% CI, 0.117-0.497), readmission 0.504 (95% CI, 0.388-0.604). Predictions were well calibrated, and the most important features within each model were consistent with clinical intuition. Discussion: Our models produce performant, well-calibrated, and interpretable predictions for COVID-19 patients at risk for the target outcomes. They demonstrate the potential to accurately estimate outcome prognosis in resource-constrained care sites managing COVID-19 patients. Conclusions: We develop and validate prognostic models targeting MV, RRT, and readmission for hospitalized COVID-19 patients which produce accurate, interpretable predictions. Additional external validation studies are needed to further verify the generalizability of our results.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available