4.7 Article

Outcomes 2 Years After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients at Low Surgical Risk

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 77, Issue 9, Pages 1149-1161

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.12.052

Keywords

aortic stenosis; surgical aortic valve replacement; transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Funding

  1. Edwards Lifesciences
  2. Medtronic
  3. Abbott
  4. Boston Scientific
  5. Abbott Vascular

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In low surgical risk patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis, the PARTNER 3 trial showed superiority of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) over surgery for the primary endpoint at 1 year. However, at 2 years, differences in death and stroke between TAVR and surgery were no longer significant, and TAVR patients had an increased risk of valve thrombosis.
BACKGROUND In low surgical risk patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis, the PARTNER 3 (Safety and Effectiveness of the SAPIEN 3 Transcatheter Heart Valve in Low Risk Patients With Aortic Stenosis) trial demonstrated superiority of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) versus surgery for the primary endpoint of death, stroke, or re-hospitalization at 1 year. OBJECTIVES This study determined both clinical and echocardiographic outcomes between 1 and 2 years in the PARTNER 3 trial. METHODS This study randomly assigned 1,000 patients (1:1) to transfemoral TAVR with the SAPIEN 3 valve versus surgery (mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons score: 1.9%; mean age: 73 years) with clinical and echocardiography follow-up at 30 days and at 1 and 2 years. This study assessed 2-year rates of the primary endpoint and several secondary endpoints (clinical, echocardiography, and quality-of-life measures) in this as-treated analysis. RESULTS Primary endpoint follow-up at 2 years was available in 96.5% of patients. The 2-year primary endpoint was significantly reduced after TAVR versus surgery (11.5% vs. 17.4%; hazard ratio: 0.63; 95% confidence interval: 0.45 to 0.88; p = 0.007). Differences in death and stroke favoring TAVR at 1 year were not statistically significant at 2 years (death: TAVR 2.4% vs. surgery 3.2%; p = 0.47; stroke: TAVR 2.4% vs. surgery 3.6%; p = 0.28). Valve thrombosis at 2 years was increased after TAVR (2.6%; 13 events) compared with surgery (0.7%; 3 events; p = 0.02). Disease-specific health status continued to be better after TAVR versus surgery through 2 years. Echocardiographic findings, including hemodynamic valve deterioration and bioprosthetic valve failure, were similar for TAVR and surgery at 2 years. CONCLUSIONS At 2 years, the primary endpoint remained significantly lower with TAVR versus surgery, but initial differences in death and stroke favoring TAVR were diminished and patients who underwent TAVR had increased valve thrombosis. (Safety and Effectiveness of the SAPIEN 3 Transcatheter Heart Valve in Low Risk Patients With Aortic Stenosis [PARTNER 3]; NCT02675114) (c) 2021 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available