4.4 Article

Feasibility, effectiveness and patient satisfaction of telerehabilitation after thumb carpometacarpal arthroplasty and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: A pilot study

Journal

JOURNAL OF TELEMEDICINE AND TELECARE
Volume 29, Issue 7, Pages 521-529

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1357633X21999578

Keywords

Telehealth; telehealth rehabilitation; telerehabilitation; upper extremity; virtual therapy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the feasibility, effectiveness, and patient satisfaction of telemedicine for thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) arthroplasty and reverse shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA). The results showed that telemedicine was not significantly different from traditional therapy in terms of range-of-motion, pain, and patient-reported functional outcomes. Patient satisfaction was high in the telemedicine group.
Introduction Telemedicine is an effective, emerging interface to connect practitioners with patients. It facilitates access to healthcare expertise, reduces costs, time demands and health disparities while improving satisfaction. This pilot study evaluated the feasibility, effectiveness and patient satisfaction of telerehabilitation for thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) arthroplasty and reverse shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA). Methods This prospective investigation was performed at a single academic institution with two hand and upper extremity fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgeons. All patients undergoing CMC arthroplasty or rTSA were eligible for inclusion. Telerehabilitation was delivered by a hybrid model including an in-person post-operative visit, followed by alternating in-clinic and virtual videoconference visits. All patients were offered participation in the study arm; those that preferred in-person therapy were included as a control group. Therapy was initiated two weeks post-operative with an in-clinic evaluation. Patients then participated in alternating in-clinic and virtual visits weekly for eight weeks, followed by one virtual visit at 14-weeks post-operative and one clinical visit at 16-weeks post-operative. Patient reported and functional outcomes were collected at each visit. Results In the CMC group, 19 study and 11 control patients were enrolled. In the rTSA group, five study and 14 control patients were enrolled. No statistically significant differences between telerehabilitation and control for range-of-motion, pain and patient-reported functional outcomes was noted. All patients in the telerehabilitation arms reported high satisfaction. Discussion Utilizing telehealth in rehabilitation may be a viable option in upper extremity recovery. We hope this pilot programme can be a model for development of future telerehabilitation programmes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available