4.7 Article

The environmental Kuznets curve in Indonesia: Exploring the potential of renewable energy

Journal

ENERGY POLICY
Volume 98, Issue -, Pages 187-198

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.08.029

Keywords

Renewable energy; Environmental Kuznets curve; Cointegration

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology in Japan (MEXT) [26000001]
  2. Ministry of Environment, Japan [S14, S15]
  3. Research and Innovation in Science and Technology Project (RISET-PRO), Ministry of Research, Technology, and Higher Education of Indonesia
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26000001] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There is an increasing interest in investigating the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis because it suggests the existence of a turning point in the economy that will lead to a sustainable development path. Although many studies have focused on the EKC, only a few empirical studies have focused on analyzing the EKC with specific reference to Indonesia, and none of them have examined the potential of renewable energy sources within the EKC framework. This study attempts to estimate the EKC in the case of Indonesia for the period of 1971-2010 by considering the role of renewable energy in electricity production, using the autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) approach to cointegration as the estimation method. We found an inverted U-shaped EKC relationship between economic growth and CO2 emissions in the long run. The estimated turning point was found to be 7729 USD per capita, which lies outside of our sample period. The beneficial impacts of renewable energy on CO2 emission reduction are observable both in the short run and in the long run. Our work has important implications both for policymakers and for the future development of renewable energy in Indonesia. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available