4.5 Review

Controversies and consensus in transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME): Is it a valid choice for rectal cancer?

Journal

JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 123, Issue -, Pages S59-S64

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jso.26340

Keywords

rectal cancer; surgical approach; taTME

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) is a novel approach for radical surgery in low rectal cancer, offering benefits such as higher rate of free distal resection margins under direct visualization and better visualization of the mesorectal plane. It is becoming increasingly popular globally, with studies suggesting that taTME may yield better short- and long-term outcomes compared to laparoscopic TME.
Transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) is a novel approach to radical surgery for low rectal cancer. taTME is associated with the benefits of a higher rate of free distal resection margins (DRM) under direct visualization, better visualization of the mesorectal plane, and the feasibility of overcoming the restriction of the distal pelvis. Thus, it is increasingly used globally. In this review, we investigated whether taTME yields better short- and long-term outcomes than laparoscopic TME.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available