4.6 Article

Acceleration mechanics during forward and backward running: A comparison of step kinematics and kinetics over the first 20 m

Journal

JOURNAL OF SPORTS SCIENCES
Volume 39, Issue 16, Pages 1816-1821

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2021.1898193

Keywords

Retro-running; sprinting; step characteristics; ground reaction force

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that BR speeds were 29% slower than FR, and most step kinematics and kinetics were different between BR and FR. The slower running speeds in BR were primarily due to lower horizontal ground reaction force application, resulting in shorter stride lengths and decreased flight times compared to FR.
Backward running (BR) and forward running (FR) are unique movements utilized by athletes in many sports. Importantly, this investigation provides further insights on BR and benchmarking against more commonly researched FR capacity. Twenty-one collegiate soccer players (age 20.0 +/- 0.8 years, body mass 65.6 +/- 7.7 kg, body height 1.70 +/- 0.07 m) performed maximal effort BR and FR along 20 m of in-ground force platforms. Step kinematics and kinetics were compared between BR and FR over four relative acceleration phases (BR = steps 1-6, 7-12, 13-18 and 19-23; FR = steps 1-4, 5-8, 9-12, 13-15). The primary findings of this study were that BR speeds were 29% slower than FR (p < 0.001), all step kinematics differed between BR and FR (p < 0.01), except contact time from the second to fourth step phases (p > 0.05), and most step kinetics were lower during BR (p < 0.05), with the exceptions of peak vertical force (p > 0.05). These findings indicate that lower running speeds over the acceleration phases of BR appear to be primarily due to lower horizontal ground reaction force application, resulting in shorter stride lengths and decreased flight times compared to FR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available