4.7 Article

A quasi-zero-stiffness dynamic vibration absorber

Journal

JOURNAL OF SOUND AND VIBRATION
Volume 494, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2020.115859

Keywords

Quasi-zero-stiffness; Dynamic vibration absorber; Ultra-low frequency; Vibration absorption

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11972152, 12002122]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2020M672476]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper proposes a quasi-zero-stiffness (QZS) DVA for ultra-low frequency vibration absorption, which is designed using a simple oblique-spring model and verified for its dynamic behavior through the harmonic balance method (HBM) and numerical analyses. Experimental results demonstrate the excellent performance of QZS DVA in absorbing ultra-low frequency vibrations.
Dynamic vibration absorbers (DVAs) are practical solutions for vibration absorption. However, it is still a challenge to absorb ultra-low frequency vibration. In this paper, a quasi-zero-stiffness (QZS) DVA is proposed for ultra-low frequency vibration absorption. Firstly, the conceptual design of the QZS DVA is carried out by using a simple oblique-spring model. Then, the dynamic behaviors of a primary system with a QZS DVA under harmonic excitation are obtained by the harmonic balance method (HBM) and verified by numerical analyses. Moreover, the dynamic behaviors under random and impulse are also given numerically. The results show that good performances of ultra-low frequency vibration absorption can be achieved by the QZS DVA under harmonic excitation, and the QZS DVA notably outperforms the linear DVA for mitigating vibration under random and impulse excitations. Finally, experiments on a vibratory system with a QZS DVA are conducted to validate the design concept of QZS DVA for ultra-low frequency vibration absorption (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available